headermask image

header image

Day By Day

There’s A Target Warehouse Just Down The Road.

I wonder if this happened there?

Expansive Praise For Someone Who Has Not Yet Done Anything.

Obama poised to rebrand America, experts say - CNN.com

(CNN) — President-elect Barack Obama is poised to restore the United States’ image in the international community, but experts say the president-elect must show the world that his actions will live up to his rhetoric.

Receiving a warm welcome is not the same as maintaining one, and Obama has a lot of work to do to improve the U.S. brand.

America’s image has declined in nearly every region of the world in recent years, but Obama’s victory “enables the United States to start again with a clean slate,” according to John Quelch, the senior associate dean at Harvard Business School.

“Americans can actually go to dinner parties and cocktail receptions around the world today and not have to apologize for the United States the way they have had to do the last several years,” he said. “The election has made life a little bit easier for Americans living and traveling abroad to hold their head up high again.”

But it is of paramount importance that Americans be able to hold their heads up at dinner and cocktail parties.

But all that Obama done so far is talk…rhetoric if you want the fancy name, but just talk.

His actions are what is going to count, and we’re a couple of months away from that. I can’t see how he can live up to his billings though. He would have to actually be The Messiah to do that.

It won’t matter thought, if he fails to accomplish what he has promised it will be Bush and the Republicans that get the blame.

That’s Gay and Retarded.

Conversation cops step in to school students

Your friend’s new fuchsia fedora might be hideous. But don’t call it gay, or you might get a language lesson from the conversation cops.Students at Queen’s University who sprinkle their dialogue with an assortment of “homo” or “retarded” could find out the hard way that not everyone finds their remarks acceptable.

The Kingston university has hired student facilitators to step in when they overhear homophobic slurs, remarks bashing women or racially tinged insults, along with an array of other language that could be deemed offensive.

That means tête-à-têtes in the residence hallways may no longer be just between friends.

Speech monitors on campus?

In the 1960s there was the Free Speech Movement on many college campus’. Now things have gone full circle. The rebels of the 60s are now the “Establishment” and they have an even more extreme reaction to free speech than the so-called “Establishment Reactionary’s” of the old days.

The more things change the more they remain the same. But no one in the “free world” would have thought of such a thing forty years ago. Monitoring people’s conversations for “political correctness” was considered the stuff of Police States and third world dictatorships.

Portland’s Wish List: Increased Taxes, Regulation, Less Accountablity

Economy, education, environment top of Portland’s list for lobbying Salem

Yeah, they call for the State legislature to provide more funds to Portland and increase regulation to spur “green jobs.” Of course they have to dip into the pockets of the rest of Oregon to bring this about. But they’re not worried. That part of Oregon didn’t support Obama, so they’re not considered full citizens.

The city is pushing for more stable funding for education and increases to public education funding at all levels,

Any time you see the phrase “Stable Funding” you should be worried. What bureaucrats mean when they talk about “stable funding” is taxes that can be raised anytime they feel like it without asking the voters.

What they really mean is a direct connection between your wallet and their checkbooks.

Politicians and bureaucrats should never be trusted with “stable funding.” Even, or especially for “worthy” causes. Those “worthy causes” tend to expand to cover all kind of things that the voters never imagined.

Finally!

The Captain’s Journal » How Many Troops Can We Logistically Support in Afghanistan?

This is something I have brought up several times in discussions about Afghanistan. But it is something that seems to get brushed aside with alarming regularity.

But it is difficult to impossible to attack and clear an enemy from the area when you don’t have enough “beans and bullets” for your troops.

This posting doesn’t exactly address the problem. But at least it admits that it could be a problem.

The old saw is “Captain’s study tactics; Generals study logistics.

Cutting an opponents supply route is an ancient and still effect means of defeating them. That is effectively what the U.S. Congress did to the South Vietnamese in 1973. They cut their supply lines while the North was still receiving full support (including tanks and fuel) from their allies. The result was inevitable.

It wasn’t the fighting ability (see the Battle of Xuan Loc) but the ability to keep the troops supplied that decided the outcome there.

But, Liberals Hate “Blacklists,” Don’t They?

What Happens If Youre on the Gay “Enemies List”

The Mormon Church is not the only group being singled out for criticism. African-Americans, 70% of whom voted yes on Proposition 8, according to a CNN exit poll, have become a target. According to eyewitness reports published on the Internet, racial epithets have been used against African-Americans at protests in California, directed even at blacks who are fighting to repeal Proposition 8. Said Evan Wolfson, executive director of Freedom to Marry, “In any fight, there will be people who say things they shouldn’t say, but that shouldn’t divert attention from what the vast majority are saying against this, that it’s a terrible injustice.” (See the Top 10 ballot measures.)

In addition to protests, gay activists have begun publishing lists online exposing individuals and organizations who have donated money in support of Proposition 8. On AntiGayBlacklist.com, individuals who gave money toward Proposition 8 are publicized, with readers urged not to patronize their businesses or services. The list of donors was culled from data on ElectionTrack.com, which follows all contributions of over $1,000 and all contributions of over $100 given before October 17. Dentists, accountants, veterinarians and the like who gave a few thousand dollars to the cause are listed alongside major donors like the Container Supply Co., Inc. of Garden Grove, Calif., which gave $250,000. “Anyone who steps into a political fight aimed at taking away fundamental rights from fellow citizens opens themselves up to criticism,” said Wolfson. “The First Amendment gives them the right of freedom of speech and to support political views, but people also have the right to criticize them.”

As usual, it depends on who is making the list.

Liberals like to speak darkly of the 1950s Hollywood “Blacklists.” As if they were something that were sent down by the government and the studios unwillingly enforced. If you want to send any Liberal into a spin just mention Richard Nixon and his so-called “enemies list”.

But since it is a politically protected group, gays, making the list it is now acceptable. There are lists and there are lists.

It seems that elections are only allowed to go one way, the way that the left and their favored causes want. Any hitch in their progress to a society where everyone is subject to discipline for expressing the wrong opinion or holding unpopular beliefs is seen as some kind of conspiracy. They people that oppose them are not seen as human or having legitimate concerns. They’re “haters.” A word co opted to mean anyone that doesn’t agree with the aims or methods of the aggrieved parties.

So when an elderly woman showed up at one of their demonstrations to oppose them, they pushed her around, took her cross, threw it on the ground and stomped on it. In another case a group broke into a church in Michigan and disrupted the service. I’m not real clear about what they were attempting to accomplish by these actions but evidently they are not too concerned about building support for their movement rather than trying to coerce people into submission.

Their use of racial slurs to express their dissatisfaction with the votes of Blacks and Hispanics would have put them in a category with the KKK if not for their protected status in the liberal hierarchy.

A commenter on one of the stories asked “If they’re so upset with Blacks and Latinos in California, why are they disrupting the church services of a bunch of white people in Michigan? Why don’t they go disrupt the services at some of the Black or Latino churches in LA?”

You know why. The white folks are not going to pound them into the pavement. That’s why.

I do sympathize with them. But they’re not doing themselves any favors by throwing a giant temper tantrum.

Commenters

On the KGW Channel 8 in Portland’s website there is a comment who recently started showing up in the comments section to various news stories. He is very good.

He writes in the style of the extreme left commenter but if you read his comments closely they resemble Frank J’s “In My World” series which is one of the great satirical series of the Internet.

For example, here is the comment he left on a story regarding the protests againsst Prop 8 in Portland.

Once again this site is overloaded with the Reich-Wing hate from the Judaic/Christian playbook sponsored by the RepubliKKKan monsters who were thankfully cashiered by the enlightened electorate on November 4th.

But then the joyous celebration stopped.

With the exception of Massachusetts and Connecticut, the rest of the country continues to elect the right people, but then does a 180 degree turn and rolls back the clock to the dark days of Jim Crow, Poll taxes, separate toilets and water fountains, and jingoistic patriotic Irving Berlin songs.

What will it take for these homophobic parasites to realize that marriage, as well as morality, is an individual choice fully recognized in our once beloved Constitution?

Only when we can stand proudly before the bar of United Nations approval,and realize that the institution of marriage,like every other racist and deluded idea held so highly by the Neo-Cons who regulate Christianity,is meant to be defined and shared among any person or group that wishes to partake,

If a transgendered person wants to marry him/herself- then who are these brutal Bush/Reagan plutocrats who dare attempt to force their bestial pious will on such a lovely person?

If three, four or eleven people regardless of sexual orientation, want to collectively marry each other, then the Newt Gingrich/Sean Hannity warped view of monogamy must stand aside and make room for the peaceful and beautiful future designed to be shared under the large and colorful rainbow tent of tolerance and diversity.

As I previously stated in other similar posts on this subject, the Courts of California once addressed this travesty by invalidating the RepubliKKKan forced ballot of 2000 where these myopic, merciless and bigoted citizens shamelessly voted 3-1 to cruelly define marriage as between one man and one woman.

I personally would think that such archaic and totalitarian ideas would have disappeared from our culture at the same time that JFK freed the slaves.

Now, covering itself again with disgrace, California, like their progressive brothers and sisters in Florida, pulled the lever once again to ban gay marriage and totally overturn what the Courts had once deemed unconstitutional.

Are we somehow to think that because the majority of voters choose something as immoral as banning gay marriage,that our courts are now rendered prostate and impotent?

It is the duty of the courts to legislate from the bench when the majority has clearly taken a pigheaded path that the members of the minority community don’t agree.

I can only continue to offer my daily chants to His Holiness the Dalai Lama in his retreat in far away Dharamsala, that he will provide the wisdom to President Obama to issue an Executive Order on January 20, 2009 which immediately terminates these notorious and discriminatory ballot measure such as we saw with California’s Measure 8.

What is really hilarious is how many other commenters take him at face value. It’s hard to satirze a bunch of nuts.

Here’s a link to his comments. I think Frank J ought to get him to write a column.

Because You Can Only Call Republicans “Hitler”?

Congressman sorry for likening Obama to Hitler

I guess Moveon.org and Olbermann think they own the rights to that comparison.

Actually, any political leader can be compared to Hitler for the simple reason that he too was a political leader.

As soon as they take power,Obama and the Democrats want to initiate a huge jobs program by building roads and bridges.

As soon as Hitler and the Nazis took power, they initiated a huge jobs program by building the Autobahns.

So Obama equals Hitler.

See how simple it is?

That’s why it is a mainstay of the Bush opposition. They’re incapable of making more complicated comparisons. For them, “Hitler” is a politician they don’t agree with; “Nazis” and “Fascists” are people that disagree with them.

I’ll not be making “Hitler” comparisons about Obama, though the German Leader did support universal health care. Just not for Jews.

First Banks, Then Automakers, Are States Next? Get Ready For The $10 Trillion Deluge

California: Hey, why not bail us out, too?

This is the latest suggestion in turning what should have been a limited program for the federal government to fix what it broke — mortgage-backed securities — into a free-for-all to subsidize failure. After all, Bass can argue, if we’re going to bail out automakers in the private sector, why not bail out the public sector as well? Who gives a damn about sovereignty when the voters may be around the corner with tar and feathers?